I am deeply concerned at the kind of sentiment expressed in Alissa Miller’s opinion piece “Time to Come Together.” Ms. Miller accuses Cecilia Le of having been “insensitive and untactful” for asking us to look at how the support for Middle Eastern terrorist activity may partially stem from US policy. A news editor should be the last person trying to stifle dialogue at a time like this. It is hard enough to cut through the propaganda that has flooded our airwaves without deliberate attacks on dissenters by those whose very job is to facilitate discourse.

Certain things, whether sensitive or not, are truthful, and these need to be taken into consideration. The United States has tacitally supported Israeli settlement and occupation activities that violate international law and result in a miserable standard of living for many Palestinians. The United States has indirectly killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians through an economic embargo that has blocked needed food and medicines. The list of wrongs goes on to include the killing of Libyan President Ghadafi’s infant daughter and the bombing of a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant that we incorrectly believed to be making biological weapons.

President Bush would like us to think that the terrorists simply “hate our freedom,” but that is a simplistic and deceiving view. If it was Western vice, or freedom of religion, or equality of the sexes that the terrorists hated, then why didn’t they choose to attack Denmark or the Netherlands, countries which undoubtedly are freer than the US?

While absolutely nothing excuses what happened on September eleventh, the truth is that many aspects of US policy in the Middle East have been indefensible themselves. There is no question that these policies are largely responsible for the Anti-Americanism within the region.

Perhaps someday our leaders will realize that we cannot beat up on an entire region of the world forever without creating significant risks to our own security. But for now we will kill Afganis, silence people like Ms. Le, and pretend that we’re not part of the problem. And that’s how we expect to have a safer world.



Coming together but disagreeing

The Gorbunova-Seluanov Lab, led by URochester’s Doris Johns Cherry Professor of Biology and Medicine Vera Gorbunova, as well as Dean’s Professor of Biology and Medicine Andrei Seluanov, studies the molecular and genetic processes behind aging in different mammals, as this class of animals provides more insight on human aging and health.  Read More

Coming together but disagreeing

Winter in Rochester is finally coming to an end, and with it, a journey I began two years ago. Now, as I inch toward graduation, I’ve increasingly found myself trying to answer a question that’s followed me for years: What makes us American? Read More

Coming together but disagreeing

The majority of the populations of both the U.S. and the U.K. evidently understand the need to move towards a renewable energy model for their countries. According to the DESNZ Public Attitudes Tracker, 80% of British adults support the use of renewable energy as of the summer of 2025. The Pew Research Center has reported that 86% of American adults support expanding wind and solar power as of May 2025. Read More