You may have noticed that the ubiquitous pink soap in University bathrooms is gone, replaced with Purell “Fragrance-Free” dispensers. Why the change?

According to Alan McNiff, the Director of River Campus Facilities and University Properties, this change was not entirely intentional.

“Initially, [the] previous product was being discontinued and we were reviewing alternatives for replacement.” The product they chose happened to be fragrance-free, which McNiff noted “a priority when evaluating the product options, but not the only factor.”

Despite the University’s monetary and logistic-targeted rationale for the change, implementing a fragrance-free product marks a stride in improving student health.

But we need intention in a decision like this.

The chemicals responsible for giving products a nice smell — say, the pleasant loamy scent of the previous UR soap — are known to harm the reproductive system and the brain, and can even cause cancer. Fragrance additives often contain hormone-disrupting phthalates and cancer-linked styrenes. Dubbed “forever chemicals,” phthalates wind up in a multitude of products — we’re exposed to them everywhere, but especially through cosmetic and personal care items. 

Current FDA regulations simply require companies to label phthalates and styrenes as “fragrance.” So, that pink soap you used in any University bathroom probably contained “fragrance,” just like many other scented products. Thus, the move to replace dispensers with fragrance-free soap lowers at least one route of phthalate exposure for students. Of course, we can be exposed elsewhere, but at least students have a safer option on campus. 

Research into how we are exposed (and the health effects post-exposure) is evolving. In fact, URMC’s Department of Environmental Medicine leads some of the cutting-edge research into the toxicity effects of chemicals like phthalates.

Connecting this research into actionable policy promotes a healthier environment, but it’s a circuitous path from a basic science lab in the Medical Center to removing fragranced soap on the River Campus. The University has the means to implement large-scale changes — like replacing its soap dispensers with fragrance-free soap — to improve student, staff, and faculty health. But it shouldn’t wait until a product is discontinued to find a better alternative. 

Other environmental health concerns still abound on campus. Grounds uses herbicides for campus landscaping, buses idle outside of Rush Rhees increasing pollutants, and aging dorms harbor mold and pests. The University should continue addressing environmental hazards — with intention — to improve the health of students.



No more pink soap: Why the University’s decision to implement fragrance-free soap is a move in the right direction

We teach the Dust Bowl as a cautionary tale. In every American history class, we learn how farmers in the 1920s and 1930s tore up millions of acres of native grassland across the Great Plains to plant wheat, how the deep-rooted prairie grasses that held the soil and trapped moisture were replaced by shallow crops and bare fields, and, when drought came in 1930, how the exposed topsoil turned to dust. Read More

No more pink soap: Why the University’s decision to implement fragrance-free soap is a move in the right direction

Winter in Rochester is finally coming to an end, and with it, a journey I began two years ago. Now, as I inch toward graduation, I’ve increasingly found myself trying to answer a question that’s followed me for years: What makes us American? Read More

No more pink soap: Why the University’s decision to implement fragrance-free soap is a move in the right direction

The Gorbunova-Seluanov Lab, led by URochester’s Doris Johns Cherry Professor of Biology and Medicine Vera Gorbunova, as well as Dean’s Professor of Biology and Medicine Andrei Seluanov, studies the molecular and genetic processes behind aging in different mammals, as this class of animals provides more insight on human aging and health.  Read More