On Sept. 26, the Students’ Association Senate approved a letter to President Seligman asking him to support Katrina relief efforts by matching any funds the school raised with university funds.

In a 15 to two vote, I was outvoted. Despite this, I remain confident in my position due to the many underlying factors not considered in this issue.

The Katrina Letter was originally a method of having the SA take a supportive position toward afflicted citizens. This intention was soon twisted and altered from its original purpose of showing student support, to asking our school to do more because it hadn’t done enough. Not only do I disagree with the notion that our school hasn’t done enough, but I also believe the senate made a mistake in supporting this statement. Accepting displaced students, proposed alternative spring breaks to afflicted areas and student supported fundraisers are only a bit of our school’s support.

One inherent issue behind the letter is discovering who is going to pay. Monetary support would have to come from somewhere, and I doubt it would be the president’s paycheck.

Instead, it would be sapping the resources of our endowment, money intended for our education. I believe it is not fair to take money from educational resources we paid for in order to give to those who are in need of financial support.

This issue segues into the problem of the university using our money to contribute to a private organization. When a student pays for tuition, they are paying for an education. When a student contributes to the American Red Cross, they are paying for relief. When a student pays for their education and the school takes their money and contributes it to an organization they may not want to support, the student is being deceived and cheated out of their money.

Some have argued that a university donation will increase the reputation of UR and make us look great in the eyes of the public. If we take this position, we are then contributing to relief efforts not because we want to support those in need, but instead, for personal gain.

As many senators and students would probably agree, that is the exact opposite of where our intentions lie.

The points I have raised influenced me to vote down the Katrina Letter. I cannot let these questions fall to the wayside because we are looking to take a stance on this issue. Even if President Seligman chooses to reject this letter, I know that through student support, we can make a difference.

Meditz can be reached at gmeditz@campustimes.org.



Opposition voiced to letter

Through a live demonstration and tasting, Chef Dede prepared fried chicken, baked macaroni and cheese, and collard greens – dishes rooted in Black Southern history. Students leaned in as she explained the methods and care that go into each plate. Read More

Opposition voiced to letter

URochester’s annual Senior Week always features a full lineup of celebrations for the graduates leading up to Commencement. The contemporary week-long fun is deeply embedded in the history of URochester culture, even though Senior Week and Commencement traditions have changed dramatically over time. Read More

Opposition voiced to letter

As per tradition, “The State of the Campus Times” updates readers on our affairs — the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) and Publisher write this pseudo-column at the start and end of every semester to articulate the struggles and joys found through managing your local student-run newspaper. We also introduce ourselves and our projects, what we hope to achieve during our terms, and we provide progress updates regarding past management’s pursuits. Read More