I found the Sept. 9, 2002 front page headline on the “Currents” newspaper (published by the University), reading: “Convocation christens academic year”, to be quite insulting.

As a student and member of the UR community I was deeply offended by this headline.

To the best of my knowledge, “christen” is a clearly Christian word, applied almost exclusively to a Christian act of naming.

Even if the editors are able to produce a definition excluding Christianity, the word has obvious Christian connotations.

While our university was founded by Baptists in 1850, to the best of my knowledge, the UR is unaffiliated with any church (or synagogue or mosque) at this time.

Convocation at the UR is not a religious event, and therefore, the Currents newspaper should not have implied that the official start to the school year was somehow related to Christianity, nor any religion whatsoever.

Furthermore, Currents should have been trying to encourage more students to attend convocation, rather than alienating with poor word selection.

At a time when our university is attempting to embrace, support, and encourage diversity, this headline is completely inappropriate because it excludes a good portion of our campus community.

The word choice demonstrates particularly poor judgment, because of its front page position on a publication assembled by the university administration.

?DAVID REINER

CLASS of 2003



Letters to the Editor, Bad word choice

URochester’s annual Senior Week always features a full lineup of celebrations for the graduates leading up to Commencement. The contemporary week-long fun is deeply embedded in the history of URochester culture, even though Senior Week and Commencement traditions have changed dramatically over time. Read More

Letters to the Editor, Bad word choice

For Catholic , this moment should not be a chance to pick a political side, but a reminder that the Church is meant to direct the conversation to peace. Read More

Letters to the Editor, Bad word choice

As recently as the early 2010s, it was standard practice for surgeons to provide 30 to 40 or more opioid pills for common, minimally invasive procedures. Most of these pills, however, would remain untouched, left over in the patient’s medical cabinet or kitchen pantries for potential misuse. A team of researchers led by URMC’s Dr. Jacob Moalem set out to reduce these opioid overprescriptions. Read More