It was pretty shocking the other day when I read the news and saw that Putin probably killed an ex-Russian-turned-U.K.-citizen special agent. I mean, I kind-of pegged him as the type of man who would retaliate when some poor bastard crossed Mother Russia, but who could’ve seen him as a murderer? He seemed more like an unfriendly neighbor who’d get in arguments about whether a lawn mower (or Crimea) was his. Nonetheless, if the British judge was correct, he’s a murderer.

Moving forward, the United Kingdom must be in a real awkward position. This has to be like confronting the playground bully about taking a single one of your chicken nuggets at lunch, when,  in reality, there wasn’t really anything stopping him or her from taking another. Out of curiosity, I Googled whether Russia will extradite. An answer was hard to come by, but I am pretty certain about how to avoid extradition to the U.S. if anyone’s previous crimes on trying to obtain free Douglass catch up to them. Either way, I feel like Putin will change the law if they try. They really should tread lightly, though. What’s stopping Russia from trying to take something from the United Kingdom rather than from Ukraine? Just kidding—the U.K. is in Western Europe, and I am sure the U.S. would respond to that.

Before any actions are taken, I think it also has to be noted that the killing occurred using a poisoned tea bag. This has to be seen as an act of hatred by Putin. First off, he killed a U.K. citizen. I mean, this probably can be easily excused. But then again, he did it using a tea bag. The only way I’d be more upset if I were part of the royal family would be if he used a scone, or some other food that the rest of the world doesn’t really enjoy because we found better alternatives (like muffins). This case is perfect for the person Sherlock Holmes is based off of—if he were still alive.



Putin probably ordered hit on Litvinenko, surprisingly

This imbalance represents a major strategic risk: Without an independent, clean, scalable, and economically viable energy scheme of its own, the U.S.’ lead in energy-intense AI tech will be short-lived. Read More


Putin probably ordered hit on Litvinenko, surprisingly

This creates a dilemma. If we only mandate what is easy for companies to implement, emissions keep rising. If we pretend everything can be decarbonized quickly, climate policy collapses under its obvious failures. A serious approach has to accept two tenets at once: we need full decarbonization everywhere that it is possible, and  we need honest promises from sectors where it is not. Read More