Anyone who has eaten at Danforth Dining in recent weeks (months? years? æ  o  n  s  ?) has likely seen this sign. You, dear reader, have likely seen this sign. I, dear reader, have most certainly seen this sign.

I dislike it very much.

Observe the sign. Take it in. Allow it to meld into your very being. Notice what it says: “Take a sec and share your thoughts! (((be))) heard”

If that wasn’t in quotes, the editors would crucify me.

Where is the consistent punctuation? Where is the consistent capitalization? What in the blazes is up with “(((be)))”?

I know what you’re thinking. Caden, those aren’t parentheses. Those are little curves drawn to represent the concept of sound emitting from the word “be” in neat little waves! No. Stop. You are wrong.

Why would there be sound emitting from the word “be”? The word “be” has nothing to do with sound! If anything, there should be sound emitting into, not from, the word “heard,” not “be.” Even sound emitting from “share” would be acceptable. But sound emitting from “be”? Preposterous!

I’ve heard other theories. Perhaps “(((be)))” is meant to give the impression that the word “be” has wings, and therefore is a visual pun on the word “bee.” This is not only wrong, but downright un-American. I refuse to elaborate on how.

If the curves around “be” are not meant to represent sound or bees, however, then the only feasible interpretation is that they are indeed parentheses. But if that is the case, what sort of message are we meant to take away from this sign? That our voices don’t matter? The use of not one, not two, but three sets of parentheses puts an enormous de-emphasis on the word “be,” as if to say “Go ahead, share your thoughts. We love the cronkly sound they make as we toss them in the wastepaper basket.” Expecting to be heard? Ha! I bet this sign is what lawmakers smile at in Florida, Missouri, Tennessee, Florida again, Kentucky, etc. whenever they get an email from a queer person pointing out the increasingly despicable (read: genocidal) nature of their legislation and rhetoric. No, I’m not bitter. Why do you ask?

In any case, assuming that Danforth Dining does not wish to deliberately mock the voice of the students, there is one last option: despair. Any attempt at interpreting the message of this sign clearly results in a loss of meaning. As a result, I now subscribe to the philosophy of Sign-Nihilism, which states that all things are meaningless (but more specifically just this sign). Join me, comrades, and together we can revel in our newfound freedom from the constraints of human morality.

But more specifically just this sign.



I really, really dislike this sign

The Gorbunova-Seluanov Lab, led by URochester’s Doris Johns Cherry Professor of Biology and Medicine Vera Gorbunova, as well as Dean’s Professor of Biology and Medicine Andrei Seluanov, studies the molecular and genetic processes behind aging in different mammals, as this class of animals provides more insight on human aging and health.  Read More

I really, really dislike this sign

Anderson’s research — which centers on leadership development and the systems-level changes needed to improve educational outcomes, especially in historically underserved communities — made her an especially attractive candidate. Read More

I really, really dislike this sign

We teach the Dust Bowl as a cautionary tale. In every American history class, we learn how farmers in the 1920s and 1930s tore up millions of acres of native grassland across the Great Plains to plant wheat, how the deep-rooted prairie grasses that held the soil and trapped moisture were replaced by shallow crops and bare fields, and, when drought came in 1930, how the exposed topsoil turned to dust. Read More