My letter is in your response to your editorial regarding alumni contributions to the University on Oct. 27.

I have been an active donor to University libraries for 20 years, and when I started giving, the intent was to benefit both current and imaginary — your word — students. In retrospect, the decision was wise, and a good investment.  

Twenty years ago, Rush Rhees Library was deteriorating and a contrast to a “name” research institution. Today, if we walked through Rush Rhees Library together, I could point out specific results of my donations. They are shiny (your word, again) and in use every day by students who were once imaginary — including members of the editorial board of the Campus Times.

In coming years, I will make more donations to keep Rush Rhees shiny — and a tool for current and imaginary students. I hope you will join me in this effort.  

Jim Mayer is a member of the National Libraries Council at the University of Rochester.

 



Donations are for current and prospective students alike

The argument I will make in this article is in defense of non-violent hazing. That is: hazing that does not lead to the death or injury of students. Read More

Donations are for current and prospective students alike

Anderson’s research — which centers on leadership development and the systems-level changes needed to improve educational outcomes, especially in historically underserved communities — made her an especially attractive candidate. Read More