In the aftermath of genocide, is forgiveness more important than justice?

That was the concluding question of last Monday’s debate between UR Debate Union (URDU) and iDebate Rwanda, a charity that enables debate training and a platform for public debate in East Africa, whose first stop on its national tour was in Rochester.

iDebate Rwanda spoke in proposition—or favor, in debate terms—while URDU spoke in opposition.

Critical thinking, introspection, and using debate as a constructive medium were the main themes of the Debate Union’s opening season event.

“Debate is not about being opponents or having adversity, but instead about looking critically at a topic as an opportunity to teach,” iDebate Rwanda presenter Amos Furaha said.

Having come from a Rwandan background and having coached debaters from the iDebate Rwanda organization, sophomore Derrick Murekezi brought the idea of hosting this event to URDU.

“The team thought engaging in this public debate would be a fantastic forum for bringing more diversity  to the Rochester campus,” freshman debater Brianna Terrell said. “Specifically, we wanted to create an entertaining public event that could expose the stories, struggles, and perspectives of real-life survivors of Rwandan genocide.”  

As URDU’s leader of opposition, Terrell began the debate by outlining the opposition’s argument, laying out points of criticism for moral hierarchies.

She established the opposition’s conception of justice, and argued that equality can only be regained through a restorative system of justice that arbitrates conflict and considers perspectives and evidence on an individualized basis.

Terrell argued that claiming forgiveness is more important than justice is counterproductive. She went on to say that while forgiveness is “one-size-fits-all,” justice is specific on a case-to-case basis, thus validating the victim.

“It was significant for me, as one of the Rochester debaters, because it gave me the chance to empathize with a situation I might not have considered otherwise,” she said. “It reminded me that nothing is an obstacle.”

Following Terrell was the deputy prime minister of iDebate Rwanda, Isabane Muhumuriza Harmonie: “Forgiveness will make the victim willing to listen, to tolerate, understand, and be a starting point to go back to living their lives. Forgiveness deals with the problems at hand, while justice covers them up.”

At the conclusion of the debate, the floor was opened for audience members’ perspectives.

“Debate is a universally valuable thing that empowers individuals and transcends any ethnicity, any religion, and any personal obstacle,” Terrell said.

Tagged: Debate


Debate Union hosts iDebate Rwanda

This past October, three professors in various fields of STEM were granted the Goergen Award in recognition of their teaching accomplishments and skills. Named after URochester Trustees Robert and Pamela Goergen, this award recognizes URochester faculty for their excellence in teaching. The Goergen Award is often awarded for top-quality classroom performance, but can also be […]

Debate Union hosts iDebate Rwanda

Buffalo started adding points to the board with a field goal kick at about minute ten in the first quarter. Though this quarter was the slowest of the game, the Raiders still scored a touchdown at four minutes into the first quarter, and made an extra point, bringing the game to 3–7. Read More

Debate Union hosts iDebate Rwanda

Based on the short story “The Wicker Husband” by Ursula Wills, the movie follows a Fisherwoman in her village, and the aftermath of her commissioning a “Wicker Husband” from the resident magical basket maker.  Read More