Recent letters to the editor received by the Campus Times have been particularly critical of members of the Editorial Board and the editorials published in recent issues.
We appreciate and even welcome criticism, feedback, corrections, and suggestions for improvement.
Unfortunately, we find some of the claims of shoddy journalistic work leveled against us recently to be deeply troubling.
Multiple letters submitted in the past week frequently allude to purported last minute correspondence, or attempted correspondence, by an unnamed member of the editorial board. These claims are categorically false.
The only members of staff at the Campus Times who have any influence or input into the editorial boards published are the five individuals listed below.
Any correspondence or contact with junior staff outside of those listed should not be  expected to reach the editorial board.



Housepital-ity

I fear I may have started this job off on the wrong foot. Right off the bat, when I stumbled into the reception of URMC, I committed the critical silly of asking where to go.

The Vance Walz debate was … refreshing?

While it definitely is not the end-all be-all to our current political climate, it showed a generation of young people what politics used to be like before the era of Donald Trump

CT Interviews: PSL presidential candidate Claudia De La Cruz

Despite most coverage focusing on Harris and Trump, some third-party candidates have been making a wave.