Response to “2004 Energy reneges on intent”:

The solution to the US’ environmental problems is not more State intervention in the free market — as Brielle Welzer argues — but radical privitization and reduction of intervention, as Murray Rothbard has argued in “For a New Liberty”.

Pollution problems stem from inadequate enforcement of private property rights and the socialization of property. In the late 19th century, factories emitted smog that damaged the orchards of nearby farmers. When the farmers took the factories to court, asking for damages and injuctions, the courts ruled that the general welfare over-ruled the farmers’ private property rights.

The rivers, lakes, oceans, and air are generally “owned” by the government. Government “ownership”, however, is different from private ownership. Bureaucrats control the resources, but have no private property rights in them, thus cannot sell them. Rather than having the incentive to preserve the value of the controlled resource, bureaucrats have incentives to exhaust the resource while they still control it.

The solution to pollution problems is to privitize State-controlled resources and to enforce property rights in them. Once these resources are privitized, we can treat pollution as a tort, and punish specific individuals or corporations who aggress against the property rights of specific individuals. Furthermore, perhaps some of the billions of dollars saved by eliminating the complex mess of environmental regulations would be spent on research to produce cleaner technology.

–David HeinrichDavid_Heinrich@urmc.rochester.edu424-3232

PS: Note to editor. If you publish this, please do not publish my phone number.



David Heinrich

After losing their personal chefs and having their commercial-grade kitchens closed for two months, Fraternity Quad residents’ kitchens were reopened near the end of October. Read More

David Heinrich

Our regulations for privatizing articles align with our policies on source anonymization: If it’s deemed that publication may endanger the author, whether to retaliation, risk of verbal or physical threat, or fear of national level surveillance (such as the potential revocation of a VISA), the article will be removed.  Read More