Two of the main complaints against this year’s incarnation of freshman housing are that it has created two years of de facto segregated housing and that as a result of their isolation freshmen and sophomores aren’t recieving valuable information from upperclassmen.

Yesterday’s “Major Madness” program went a long way to remedy some of these problems. The program’s Danforth location was ideal since it is at the heart of sophomore living and provided valuable information on majors and clusters that underclassmen can no longer access through student sources. Since upperclassmen have experienced the upperlevel classes that provide the meat of most majors, they can provide insight and information about classes and majors that freshmen and sophomores can’t know.

One of the important tenets in the creation of freshman housing was to provide large amounts of programming to help freshmen assimilate into the campus community. Overall, educational programming has been severely lacking this year, but if limited programming is to occur, this is just the right topic on which to focus.

Many of UR’s majors leave little room for error, and students cannot afford to wait until their junior year to begin getting serious about their education. Major Madness allowed this year’s freshmen and sophomore classes the same advantages as earlier classes have had, and gave them the power to make informed decisions that will have a large impact on their future. This program did exactly what underclass programming should do and there should be more functions like it.



Major solutions

In my final weeks as the Publisher of the Campus Times, I am writing “The State of the Campus Times” — a report on the progress and challenges of our student-run newspaper — for the final time before handing the baton to the next Publisher. Read More

Major solutions

Clearly, we need a far different approach to conserving government funds and setting tax rates than what the Anglo-American right is providing. Read More

Major solutions

Our regulations for privatizing articles align with our policies on source anonymization: If it’s deemed that publication may endanger the author, whether to retaliation, risk of verbal or physical threat, or fear of national level surveillance (such as the potential revocation of a VISA), the article will be removed.  Read More