Last week, The Washington Post reported that the U.S. government, technology companies and two major airline carriers would begin testing a radical, innovative airline security screening system. This new computer network will utilize vast quantities of passengers’ personal information, and will link government and private databases to every reservation system in the country. Federal aviation authorities intend to use data-mining and predictive software in this system to monitor passenger activity and recognize potential threats.

This “big brother” style procedure will use information such as credit histories and driver’s license data to compile a profile that could include an individual’s travel history and living arrangements. Currently, airline officials are already negotiating with lawmakers to modify and weaken privacy protections in the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act.

Critics of this system state that this form of “surveillance infrastructure” has the capability of eroding existing privacy protections, and are disturbed by the idea of government-sponsored background checks. In addition, there is concern that this system will be used for other purposes, such as locating deadbeat parents, drug dealers or any individuals guilty of unlawful behavior.

The government needs to stop trampling on U.S. citizens’ Constitutional right to privacy. There are other ways of protecting our lives, without infringing on our rights.

Instead of using a system which utilizes sensitive personal information, the government should adopt an alternative system called biometrics. The biometric system collects information such as iris scans, fingerprints, and other physiological or behavioral characteristics to identify individuals. Passengers would travel through screening facilities with ease, and need not worry about others scrutinizing their personal information.



Securing privacy

Mittal drew on her experience at the Department of Justice, describing the scale of the Jan. 6 prosecutions, which involved nearly 1,600 criminal cases. While the events were widely characterized as an unprecedented attack on democratic institutions, the legal system approached them through existing statutory frameworks. Read More

Securing privacy

The argument I will make in this article is in defense of non-violent hazing. That is: hazing that does not lead to the death or injury of students. Read More

Securing privacy

The Gorbunova-Seluanov Lab, led by URochester’s Doris Johns Cherry Professor of Biology and Medicine Vera Gorbunova, as well as Dean’s Professor of Biology and Medicine Andrei Seluanov, studies the molecular and genetic processes behind aging in different mammals, as this class of animals provides more insight on human aging and health.  Read More