I am deeply concerned at the kind of sentiment expressed in Alissa Miller?s Editorial Observer ?Time to come together? in the Sept. 20 CT. Miller accuses Cecilia Le of having been ?insensitive and untactful? for asking us to look at how the support for Middle Eastern terrorist activity may partially stem from U.S. policy.

A news editor should be the last person trying to stifle dialogue at a time like this. It is hard enough to cut through the propaganda that has flooded our airwaves without deliberate attacks on dissenters by those whose very job is to facilitate discourse.

Certain things, whether sensitive or not, are truthful, and these need to be taken into consideration.

The United States has tacitly supported Israeli settlement and occupation activities that violate international law and result in a miserable standard of living for many Palestinians.

The United States has indirectly killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians through an economic embargo that has blocked needed food and medicines.

The list of wrongs goes on to include the killing of Libyan President Quadafi?s infant daughter and the bombing of a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant that we incorrectly believed to be making biological weapons.

President George W. Bush would like us to think that the terrorists simply ?hate our freedom,? but that is a simplistic and deceiving view. If it was Western vice, or freedom of religion, or equality of the sexes that the terrorists hated, then why didn?t they choose to attack Denmark or the Netherlands, countries that undoubtedly are freer than the U.S.?

While absolutely nothing excuses September 11, the truth is that many aspects of U.S. policy in the Middle East have been indefensible themselves. There is no question that these policies are largely responsible for the anti-Americanism within the region.

Perhaps someday our leaders will realize that we cannot beat up on an entire region of the world forever without creating significant risks to our own security. But for now, we will kill Afghans, silence people like Le and pretend that we?re not part of the problem. That?s how we expect to have a safer world.

? John BrachClass of 2002



Coming together, not being silent

The majority of the populations of both the U.S. and the U.K. evidently understand the need to move towards a renewable energy model for their countries. According to the DESNZ Public Attitudes Tracker, 80% of British adults support the use of renewable energy as of the summer of 2025. The Pew Research Center has reported that 86% of American adults support expanding wind and solar power as of May 2025. Read More

Coming together, not being silent

We teach the Dust Bowl as a cautionary tale. In every American history class, we learn how farmers in the 1920s and 1930s tore up millions of acres of native grassland across the Great Plains to plant wheat, how the deep-rooted prairie grasses that held the soil and trapped moisture were replaced by shallow crops and bare fields, and, when drought came in 1930, how the exposed topsoil turned to dust. Read More

Coming together, not being silent

Mittal drew on her experience at the Department of Justice, describing the scale of the Jan. 6 prosecutions, which involved nearly 1,600 criminal cases. While the events were widely characterized as an unprecedented attack on democratic institutions, the legal system approached them through existing statutory frameworks. Read More