Back in the days of the Roman Empire, music was a sacred and classical art that reflected the traditions of a civilization. More than 1500 years later, music has taken a new role in our society, transcending the category of art and blending it with popular trends, cultural identity and sheer entertainment sought by our consumer culture.

The cost of music can be equalled to the stock market – unstable at times, profitable and inevitably cut throat. Despite these factors music will continue to be a free market.

The price of music will continue to fluctuate between the reasonable price range of $10-$20, depending on the work put into by the label, marketing and promotion costs and aims of the band.

Fortunately for the executives, the digital era has allowed the promotional process to cut down on slowly disappearing packaging costs as artists release more of their music in digital format.

Despite all this, the price of music will be regulated as it always has – with the purchasing power of the independent consumer which is manipulated and controlled by the industry’s facets of marketing.

The music industry is the entertainment business’ two-way street. Artists make music and in turn rely on the executive music, film and advertising industries to propel and sell their record turning profit. Writers, editors, promoters, marketers, engineers, DJs and others all have pivotal roles in “breaking” a record.

The distribution of profits for a record depends on the parties’ involvement in making and selling the record. Yes, I said it – selling, because it is that one factor that defines the character of the industry.

While the band may work hard on a record, it is their label, which is also their promotional backbone, that works extremely hard, sending thousands of mail-outs to radio, contacting DJs, calling radio stations and running street teams.

Encouraging a better relationship between the artist and the label will encourage a healthier and more adequate pay scene for the industry.

Regardless of the industry’s efforts, the consumer should not ignore the millions of dollars in publishing labels reap in, nor let Apple conveniently slide away with a 52 cent cut on a 99 cent song. If both of these aspects were addressed that would make music cheaper, and in turn would give the artists more of their well-deserved earnings.



Price of music not reflected in artist pay

Perhaps if this movie had good music or better dialogue it would be slightly enjoyable, but the real culprit was the exceedingly cliche plot lines, uninspired characters, and the overwhelming lack of Christmas authenticity.  Read More

Price of music not reflected in artist pay

The Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra played the score of the film live, while the movie itself was projected above the musicians. It was a beautiful performance and an affectionate tribute to such a famous film.  Read More

Price of music not reflected in artist pay

Our regulations for privatizing articles align with our policies on source anonymization: If it’s deemed that publication may endanger the author, whether to retaliation, risk of verbal or physical threat, or fear of national level surveillance (such as the potential revocation of a VISA), the article will be removed.  Read More