There are two little-known ways of “checking” dangerous Supreme Court decisions. The precept of “checks and balances” is little understood by far too many Americans and hated by others.

1) Article 111, Section II of the U.S. Constitution empowers the national Congress (simple majority of both houses) to limit or even nullify Supreme Court appellate decisions [One could argue whether “a” state was truly a party in this case by virtue of the way the Court worded its “ruling”. Furthermore, Congress has the power to dissolve the federal judiciary – Congress created it in the first place. It cannot dissolve the Supreme Court itself as that Court is organic to the Constitution — but again the congress could “check” it],2) Another “check” is that of the Executive Branch refusing to enforce a Supreme Court decision. President Andrew Jackson (whether or not one agrees with the merits of the case) did such….There is yet another consideration. Historically the Supreme Court either was to render a decision on a “particular” case OR remand said case back to the states if the Court judged it was not a “federal” (or better stated “national”) matter.

Furthermore, when a lawful Supreme Court decision was made, it was to be the “law of the case” — NOT the “law of the land”! That decision could be used as a precedent for future cases, to be sure. The recent SC decision concerning “minors'” convicted of murder seems to perpetuate the nonsense of “law of the land”.

However, the real issue hinted at previously that has escaped virtually everyone is this: The aforementioned case is NOT a “federal” [sic] i.e. national matter regardless of what the Supreme Court or other misinformed “experts” say. As Thomas Jefferson stated we have far too many exercising “will” instead of “judgment”.

This case should have been remanded back to the states. This is part and parcel of the concept of “federalism” — unknown and alien to most Americans thanks to our national media and public schools.

We Americans need to awaken! Pretentious trousered or skirted apes dressed in black robes does not justice make.



Supreme Court: power corrupts…

For graduated senior Helen Jackson, who hadn’t been able to go home for breaks for the past two years, these last few months have been a much-needed break. “I’m moving halfway across the country in July for my PhD program, so I probably won’t be able to come home very often after this,” she said. Read More

Supreme Court: power corrupts…

URochester’s annual Senior Week always features a full lineup of celebrations for the graduates leading up to Commencement. The contemporary week-long fun is deeply embedded in the history of URochester culture, even though Senior Week and Commencement traditions have changed dramatically over time. Read More

Supreme Court: power corrupts…

So far, I’ve already tried a few alternative methods because, according to my doctor, my liver “can’t take much more of this,” and I think one has finally stuck. Read More